New release cycle proposal (was Rolling release model philosophy (was ...))
Jason Brooks
jbrooks at redhat.com
Tue Nov 6 19:16:58 UTC 2012
On 11/06/2012 10:55 AM, Matthieu Gautier wrote:
> No, I never suggest that. Preview versions have a timelife of 6mo
> instead of 12.
> Stable version have a lifetime of 24mo (12mo for regular updates)
> instead of 12.
The cycle would have to go: stable, preview, preview, stable, and so on
to avoid maintaining more than two releases at a time.
If it went back and forth between stable and preview, you'd have three
supported releases at once in the second half of year two.
>
> Regards,
> Matthieu Gautier
>
>>
>> How about NO?
>>
>> https://gs1.wac.edgecastcdn.net/8019B6/data.tumblr.com/tumblr_mbfshfloal1rpdotto1_1280.jpg
>>
>
--
@jasonbrooks
More information about the devel
mailing list