New release cycle proposal (was Rolling release model philosophy (was ...))

[Mark Bidewell]

oddly this looks a lot like the Ubuntu release cycle if you replace stable
with LTS


On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Jason Brooks <jbrooks at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 11/06/2012 10:55 AM, Matthieu Gautier wrote:
>
>  No, I never suggest that. Preview versions have a timelife of 6mo
>> instead of 12.
>> Stable version have a lifetime of 24mo (12mo for regular updates)
>> instead of 12.
>>
>
> The cycle would have to go: stable, preview, preview, stable, and so on to
> avoid maintaining more than two releases at a time.
>
> If it went back and forth between stable and preview, you'd have three
> supported releases at once in the second half of year two.
>
>
>> Regards,
>> Matthieu Gautier
>>
>>
>>> How about NO?
>>>
>>> https://gs1.wac.edgecastcdn.**net/8019B6/data.tumblr.com/**
>>> tumblr_mbfshfloal1rpdotto1_**1280.jpg<https://gs1.wac.edgecastcdn.net/8019B6/data.tumblr.com/tumblr_mbfshfloal1rpdotto1_1280.jpg>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
>
> @jasonbrooks
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.**org/mailman/listinfo/devel<https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel>




-- 
Mark Bidewell
http://www.linkedin.com/in/markbidewell
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20121106/a02f72b7/attachment.html>