Unblocking packages: new review needed?

[tim.lauridsen at gmail.com]

On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Alec Leamas <leamas.alec at gmail.com> wrote:

> No top-posting in fedora-devel :)
>
>
Sorry :)


> Besides that, I can just agree with Tim. The oldest package was reviewed
> less than a year ago, the two others last summer. Requiring a new review
> is, well, somewhat formal.
>
> That said, it should be easy to review these to resolve this issue.  If
> you just make some new review requests, linking to the previous review I'll
> guess this could be handled without to much problems.
>

I don't see anywhere in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process

That a new review is needed,

"Reviews are currently done for totally new packages, package
renames<http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Renaming_Process#Re-review_required>,
and packages merged from the old Fedora Core repository."

I don't see this case, fits any of the cases.

Tim
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20121107/6639b92d/attachment.html>