[@core] working definition for the minimal package set

[Lennart Poettering]

On Wed, 14.11.12 17:15, Stephen John Smoogen (smooge at gmail.com) wrote:

> >> How about a separate group for containers, since the packages and use
> >> case are very different than 'core' provides?
> >>
> >> @core-container ? or @container ?
> >
> > Well, it would be weird that the "minimal" installation is actually not
> > "minimal" at all, but the "container" installation is.
> 
> I didn't think one installed an OS inside a container.. but basically
> copied what one wanted into it... eg running anaconda to build a
> container means you already went too far :).

Oh, I wasn't aware that this is solely about anaconda-based installs,
sorry.

For containers a yum group for usage with --installroot= is the only
thing that matters. 

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.