[@core] working definition for the minimal package set

[Matthew Miller]

On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:03:36PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Is there any reason those two can't be split up? Maybe @really-hard-core
> > for the first, and @core for the second. ;-)
> That's basically what Kevin proposed several mails back, and I agree it
> seems like we have two broadly definable cases here rather than one.

I think Bill Nottingham mentioned something similar too, although I don't
want to put words into his mouth.

I'm open to the possibility, but I think using "default" instead of
mandatory for many packages in @core covers this distinction relatively
well. Then we have @standard for the next level.

-- 
Matthew Miller  ☁☁☁  Fedora Cloud Architect  ☁☁☁  <mattdm at fedoraproject.org>