Beta status: blockers, karma etc

[Bruno Wolff III]

On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 00:35:43 -0800,
   Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>systemd was in TC9, so you can upkarma based on TC9 testing. The texlive
>update is a blocker only for reasons of taking up lots of space on the
>DVD - normal testing that it still works, deps are sane etc should be
>all it needs.

I don't know that it would be a blocker, but there are still older versions 
of passivetex and xmltex which don't look like they should be in the repos 
any more since it looks like texlive-passivetex and texlive-xmltex are 
intended to replace them and have file conflicts with texlive-xmltex.
There is also dblatex which doesn't seem to be replaced by anything in 
texlive (it's not obsoleted and there isn't a texlive-dblatex) which 
pulls in passivetex and xmltex (which conflict with texlive-xmltex).