Self Introduction

[Edward Mann]

I will get those packages signed. 

Thanks 

On , Rudolf Kastl
wrote: 

> Another comment: while you keep that repository up id really
welcome if you could sign the packages in your private repo. 
> 
>
2012/11/29 Rudolf Kastl <che666 at gmail.com>
> 
>> Actually the baseurl
provided in your paste does not work for me.
>> 
>> here is the fixed
entry:
baseurl=http://www.edmann.com/Enlightenment/repo/Fedora/$releasever/x86_64/RPMS
[6]
>> 
>> 2012/11/29 Edward Mann <e.dev at edmann.com>
>> 
>>> On , Tom
Callaway wrote: 
>>> 
>>>> On 11/27/2012 02:47 PM, Edward Mann
wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> I would like to be the maintainer for the
Enlightenment e17 for Fedora. I am sending this e-mail to seek guidance
and also a sponsor. Getting e17 on Fedora i will need to build and
install the following packages eina - Core data structure library.
>>>>

>>>> In Fedora as "libeina" (I own it)
>>>> 
>>>>> eet - Data
encode/decode and storage library.
>>>> 
>>>> In Fedora as "eet" (I own
it)
>>>> ecore - Core mainloop, display abstraction and utility library.

>>>> 
>>>> In Fedora as "e> eft: 5px; width: 100%;">embryo - Small Pawn
based virtual machi
>>>> er. edje - Abstract GUI layout and animation
object library. efreet - Standards handling for freedesktop.org [1]
standards. e_dbus - Dbus wrapping and glue 
>>>> 
>>>>> motion, video
and audio codec API... ethumb - EThumb, thumbnail generation library...
eio - Eio, async I/O library... 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I don't think any of these
are in Fedora, so they'd be a great place to
>>>>> start. Let me know if
you need any changes to the four packages I own,
>>>>> once you get in
the packager group, I'd be happy to let you comaintain them.
>>>>>

>>>>> ~tom
>>>>> 
>>>>> ==
>>>>> Fedora Project
>>> 
>>> Thanks for the
response Tom. I had searched the packages, however i realized i needed
to go one more page in the package list to find those that you own. E17
currently needs all packages to be at the 1.7.2 release. The
Enlightenment team plans on keeping them all at the same version number
even if some packages have no changes. You probably already know this.

>>> 
>>> I think i remember removing libeina when i installed my build
of eina. If we can get libeina up to 1.7.2 then i will adjust the
packages to look for libeina and not eina. 
>>> 
>>> I have all the
packages up on my website
http://www.edmann.com/Enlightenment/repo/Fedora/17/ [2] 
>>> 
>>> Also i
have the yum repo 
>>> 
>>> [Enlightenment]
>>> name=Enlightenment for
Fedora $releasever
>>>
baseurl=http://edmann.com/Enlightenment/repo/Fedora/$releasever/X86_64/RPMS
[3]
>>> enabled=1
>>> metadata_expire=7d
>>> gpgcheck=0
>>>
[Enlightenment - Sources]
>>> name=Enlightenment SRPMS for Fedora
$releasever
>>>
baseurl=http://edmann.com/Enlightenment/repo/Fedora/$releasever/SRPMS
[4]
>>> enabled=1
>>> metadata_expire=7d
>>> gpgcheck=0 
>>> 
>>> Right
now it's only for x86_64, i will build another vm and do i386 packages.
Not sure if that will be needed, but people might come across it and
want those. I will also do 18 beta as well. 
>>> 
>>> Do i need to make
a bug request for each package or is that premature for me to do right
now? 
>>> 
>>> Thanks 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> devel mailing list
>>>
devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel [5]




Links:
------
[1] http://freedesktop.org
[2]
http://www.edmann.com/Enlightenment/repo/Fedora/17/
[3]
http://edmann.com/Enlightenment/repo/Fedora/$releasever/X86_64/RPMS
[4]
http://edmann.com/Enlightenment/repo/Fedora/$releasever/SRPMS
[5]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[6]
http://www.edmann.com/Enlightenment/repo/Fedora/$releasever/x86_64/RPMS
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20121129/777f4222/attachment.html>