upstream wants me to rename my package
mattia.verga at tiscali.it
Sat Sep 8 09:32:24 UTC 2012
I don't see the reason for someone to install and use two versions of
the same thing and I think that renaming the package other than project
name is a bad idea...
Besides that, if the developer doesn't want that others redistribuite
his program he can always change the license or become co-maintainer of
the package in fedora repos.
Il 07/09/2012 22:54, Gary Gatling ha scritto:
> I am working on a package called VirtualGL:
> After contacting the upstream on their mailing list, they seem
> obsessed with being able to install their own rprms and my package
> together at the same time. This seems odd / bad to me since only one
> vglrun could be in the path. He keeps talking about using symlinks in
> /opt and so forth to to somehow make my package able to co-exists with
> his package downloadable at:
> He does want me to change the package name also. Is it too late for me
> to that after that package has been accepted into fedora? Here is
> what he says about that:
> In terms of naming, I would suggest naming your RPM something besides
> VirtualGL. If you are splitting it into multiple RPMs, then this is
> easy. Just ship RPMs named "VirtualGL-common", "VirtualGL-client",
> "VirtualGL-utils", "VirtualGL-server", "VirtualGL-devel", etc., and none
> of them will actually be named "VirtualGL". Or maybe use
> "VirtualGL-fedora" or some alternative (even lowercase "virtualgl",
> If a upstream project somehow objects to someone packaging their
> software should you just give up and tell people that the upstream
> would prefer you download their self created rpms or is it considered
> acceptable to go ahead and package their software over their objections?
> He says at the end of his email:
> "'I'm willing to help out in any way I can, within reason, but I will also
> re-iterate that VirtualGL was never really designed to be integrated
> into an O/S distribution."
> Thanks for any thoughts you guys might have about this surprising
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the devel