dependency bug wodim/genisoimage

Adam Williamson awilliam at
Wed Sep 26 21:42:14 UTC 2012

On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 10:42 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
> On 26 September 2012 01:04, Adam Williamson <awilliam at> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 01:25 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
> >
> > All official Fedora composes are done using spin-kickstarts git, not the
> > packaged spin-kickstarts. The packaged spin-kickstarts tends to lag
> > behind git rather a lot because it isn't actually used for anything, so
> > people rarely bother to update it.
> >
> >
> > So that's a wrist slap for us, and for practical purposes, if you're
> > doing any kind of Fedora re-spinning, use a git checkout of
> > spin-kickstarts and pull regularly, do not use the packaged one.
> Okay, thanks. That seems to have fixed a number of issues for me. The
> wodim/genisoimage problem I originally reported has stopped
> complaining, though that seems to be because the package install order
> reshuffles when new packages are added. I haven't reported bugs in
> them as neither is in bugzilla and not quite sure where to report
> that.

They both come from the 'cdrkit' .src.rpm, so you'd want the 'cdrkit'
component in Bugzilla. Bugzilla goes by .src.rpm name not binary rpm
name. rpm -qi can tell you the .src.rpm from which any binary package
was built.
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | adamwfedora

More information about the devel mailing list