dependency bug wodim/genisoimage
awilliam at redhat.com
Wed Sep 26 21:42:14 UTC 2012
On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 10:42 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
> On 26 September 2012 01:04, Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 01:25 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
> > All official Fedora composes are done using spin-kickstarts git, not the
> > packaged spin-kickstarts. The packaged spin-kickstarts tends to lag
> > behind git rather a lot because it isn't actually used for anything, so
> > people rarely bother to update it.
> > So that's a wrist slap for us, and for practical purposes, if you're
> > doing any kind of Fedora re-spinning, use a git checkout of
> > spin-kickstarts and pull regularly, do not use the packaged one.
> Okay, thanks. That seems to have fixed a number of issues for me. The
> wodim/genisoimage problem I originally reported has stopped
> complaining, though that seems to be because the package install order
> reshuffles when new packages are added. I haven't reported bugs in
> them as neither is in bugzilla and not quite sure where to report
They both come from the 'cdrkit' .src.rpm, so you'd want the 'cdrkit'
component in Bugzilla. Bugzilla goes by .src.rpm name not binary rpm
name. rpm -qi can tell you the .src.rpm from which any binary package
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
More information about the devel