package, package2, package3 naming-with-version exploit

[Mattias Ellert]

tor 2013-04-04 klockan 17:29 +0200 skrev Vít Ondruch:
> Dne 4.4.2013 16:20, Miloslav Trmač napsal(a):
> > esthetics.
> >
> 
> May be I misunderstood the thread, but wasn't this the main point since 
> the beginning? To prevent the "naming-with-version" exploit as is still 
> stated in the $SUBJECT?
> 
> It might looks like the thread would be named like "how to install 
> multiple versions on single package" but it was not. Clearly, there are 
> ways. There are even policies in place. The brainstorming was how to do 
> it right, but there is no will. Every steak holder just repeats how to 
> achieve it currently, no how to do it right.

I think you misunderstand here. I think the replies contain the current
way, not because it is the current way, but because those who reply
consider the current way to be the right way. For me the current way
makes sense and I would not like to change it.

	Mattias

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4575 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130404/6b832278/attachment.bin>