Expanding the list of "Hardened Packages"

[Rahul Sundaram]

On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Steve Grubb wrote:

>
> I don't think there is any need to extend the set of packages that _should_
> get hardening. The current guidelines are sufficient. What is not
> happening is
> the packages that have apps that fit the need to be hardened are not
> getting
> the proper hardening. I have opened dozens of bugs on the "core" packages
> that
> matter, but even those bz are still not complete.
>

Is there a tracker bug?  Proven packagers can help

Rahul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130413/70ac7ddf/attachment.html>