[ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 20 v2

Peter Robinson pbrobinson at gmail.com
Fri Aug 16 21:33:38 UTC 2013


On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting at redhat.com> wrote:
> Peter Robinson (pbrobinson at gmail.com) said:
>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:26 PM, Kalev Lember <kalevlember at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On 08/16/2013 10:15 PM, Till Maas wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 03:17:42PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> FTBFS packages need:
>> >>>
>> >>> 1) a list gathered by pruning the old F18FTBFS bug, or noting what things
>> >>> still have earlier dist tags
>> >>
>> > [snip]
>> >> Nevertheless, as far as I can see there is nothing to do wrt FTBFS for
>> >> F20.
>> >
>> > The following repoquery shows a number of packages that still have .fc17
>> > disttags in rawhide and have likely been failing in mass rebuilds:
>>
>> your better off using koji to query the builds tagged as it gives you
>> the source package named.
>>
>> $ koji list-tagged --latest f20 | grep fc1[4-8]
>
> Actually, now that I re-read what we did before, for F-20 we'd block things
> that have failed to build since *before* F-18, i.e., those with fc17 or
> earlier dist tags.

I thought that originally but then fc18 will be going EOL just after
fc20 goes gold and hence I thought it was fc18, doesn't matter either
way I suppose.

Peter


More information about the devel mailing list