Heads-up: Obsolete but still included packages

[Peter Robinson]

On 19 Aug 2013 19:51, "Till Maas" <opensource at till.name> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:44:02AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > A couple of obsolete packages is still included in Rawhide. Usually
> > that means a package has not been retired yet or has been retired
> > incompletely:
> >
> >   https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
> >
> > In some cases, the dead package is only missing the koji block request
> > in Fedora rel-eng trac. In other cases, the package has not even been
> > marked a "dead.package" in git yet:
>
> > Obsolete ('latexdiff', 'noarch', '0', '1.0.2', '4.fc20')
>
> How did you create the list? At least this one seems to be a false
> positive, because it is not retired:

Isn't that what he says in the first sentence... Orphaned but not properly
retired?

> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/latexdiff
>
> Regards
> Till
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130819/1d06d313/attachment.html>