[ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20

[Peter Robinson]

On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Till Maas <opensource at till.name> wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:21:38PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 23:05:32 +0200
> > Till Maas <opensource at till.name> wrote:
> >
> > > The following packages did not build for two releases and will be
> > > retired around 2013-08-26 unless someone rebuilds them or announces to
> > > actively working on fixing them.
> > >
> > > Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the
> > > affected packages or a package that depends on one.
> > >
> > >         Package                            (co)maintainers
> > >
> ===========================================================================
> > > libvpd                    emunson, hegdevasant, fkocina, lnykryn,
> > > rrakus, jskala
> > > lsvpd                     emunson, hegdevasant, fkocina, lnykryn,
> > > wolfy, rrakus, jskala
> >
> > these 2 are ppc/ppc64 specific and actively maintained, so they should
> > be whitelisted, because they won't have new builds in primary koji
>
> There is no whitelist, but they could be blocked in primary koji I
> guess.
>

No they can't, the sync of blocked/new packages is synced over all
secondary arches. They could likely be untagged so they don't show up in
the list.

Peter
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130819/f71461e1/attachment.html>