RFC: Spins process changes proposal

["Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"]

On 08/20/2013 07:32 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> >Is it not better to come up with some kind of spin/mentor process
>> >with releng/infra where each spin sub-community learns,provides and
>> >is ultimately reasonable for creating their own spins as opposed to
>> >releng/infra wasting valuable time/resource hosting and trying to
>> >keep those spins spinning?
> Possibly, but it's unclear to me if there is any "sub-commuity" around
> some of them.

If there are no sub-community surrounding relevant spin/product it 
arguably should be removed since the relevant spins failed to created 
"target audience" and failed to build a community around it self.

>   Perhaps there is any they just haven't been aware that
> they should help testing?
>   

Not just testing but also do the necessary releng work to create the 
spin in the first place but honestly why should sub-community bother if 
there are others that both create the spin and do the QA for them?

JBG