Overall fedora-review test results.

[Michael Schwendt]

On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:27:47 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:

> In an attempt to test fedora-review we have run it on almost allpackages 
> in the complete rawhide distribution. Our primary objective is to 
> certify that fedora-review is stable for all this kind of input. Also, 
> these test reveals some false warnings and other errors. Some are 
> detected and fixed, some certainly  not. This is a lot of data.
> 
> The overall results with some comments are at http://ur1.ca/f5xxw . Here 
> are some interesting findings such as a package with files in /buildroot
> and more than 1200 packages without working source url.  However, this 
> is basically excess information for me.  Hereby shared.
> 
> --alec

Funny! I'm interested in hearing more about these,

  | 347 CheckStaticLibs
  |        Static libs not in a -static package. Most are haskell packages
  |        which have an exception not handled by f-r. There are more, though.

since  http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/staticbugstat.html  is an ongoing
project. So far, I exclude Haskell and OCaml packages, Tcl/Tk stub libs,
flex-static, and the fake shared libs in binutils-devel (they are .so
GNU ld scripts that link with the static libs instead).