Overall fedora-review test results.

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:03:22 +0200
Alec Leamas <leamas.alec at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 2013-08-22 15:54, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > Yes... sorry I assumed you knew...
> >
> > <package>-owner at fedoraproject.org <mailto:owner at fedoraproject.org>
> >
> > Richard
> No, I don't know much.
> 
> Well, it should basically be piece of cake to generate such an email
> for all  packages. Before doing such a thing I would certainly like
> to have some kind of conclusion that's is a good thing to do on this
> list. Not all of these email would contain relevant info.
> 
> There are alternatives. I could perhaps arrange a directory tree with
> a report for each package which is accessible to be less invasive.

Yeah, I would think a site/tree with the reports first at least would
be good. Folks on this list could look at their packages and see if
there's things that are false positives or could be fixed up in some
clean system wide way. 

Then, you could run again and mail owners a link to their packages
reports ? 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130822/0c2c7d7c/attachment.sig>