Bundled Flash

T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingsworth at gmail.com
Fri Aug 23 04:56:23 UTC 2013


On 8/15/13, T.C. Hollingsworth <tchollingsworth at gmail.com> wrote:
> It's come to my attention that a number of packages contain Flash (.swf)
> files,
> but absolutely none of them have BuildRequires on a free software Flash
> toolchain, nor do any of them seem to be shipping the source for these
> files.
> :-(
>
> It has never been permissible to included prebuilt files of this nature in
> Fedora [1], and FPC unequivocally stated during today's meeting that they
> have
> no interest in making an exception for this.
>
> Please remove this prohibited content from your packages, or ensure that
> any
> included .swf files are built from source using a free software toolchain
> like
> `swfc` during the %build phase.  A list of affected packages sorted by owner
> is
> included below, and I'll be filing bugs for these soon.

Bugs are now filed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=WebAssets-BundledBinaries

The query ran for this includes Flash files (.swf), Flash source files
(.fla), Silverlight files (.xap), and Shockwave Director (.dcr) files.
 No new packages were surfaced by the expanded query but quite a few
that have .swf files turned out to be bundling some of the more exotic
kind too.

The list of files found is included with the bug, of course.

Anyone who has fixed their packages in Rawhide already won't get a
bug.  If you did get a bug despite having fixed your package please
double-check it, as these files still appear as of last night's
Rawhide compose. There was at least one I thought someone already said
they had fixed.

-T.C.


More information about the devel mailing list