Overall rawhide package testing.

Parag N(पराग़) panemade at gmail.com
Mon Aug 26 13:50:03 UTC 2013


Hi,


On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Parag N(पराग़) <panemade at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Alec Leamas <leamas.alec at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> As agreed  [1], we have run fedora-review on (almost) all packages in
>> current rawhide. The results are now available at [2]. Here are reports on
>> issues by package and packages by issue.
>>
>> We have discussed sending email about these results to the package
>> owners. Is this a good idea? In any case, I think it might be good if you
>> check your own packages, chances are that something otherwise unnoticed is
>> discovered. Please don't forget the README.
>>
>> For those interested in the  overall distribution, the package by issue
>> reports perhaps also might add something as well as the 'stats' file in the
>> top dir.
>>
>>
>>
>  I see some of my packages listed and when I look for why its listed, I
> can't figure out. I now need to run fedora-review on those packages. If
> possible provide results directory with all three log files to understand
> what is wrong in the package.
>
>
   Thanks Alec for giving me some understanding on this on IRC. I found
http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/fedora-review/tree/README and as written
there I see my packages are clean.


Regards,
> Parag
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130826/244271b0/attachment.html>


More information about the devel mailing list