Dear Fedora Packagers!

Toshio Kuratomi a.badger at gmail.com
Wed Aug 28 16:04:23 UTC 2013


On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 04:27:44PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thanks for your interest. It is a reoccuring problem that both the rename
> > request submitter *and* the reviewer get the Obsoletes tags wrong.
> 
> Perhaps the guidelines should be more clear, then.  (No, I don't have
> a specific proposal.)
>
I've highlighted the %{?dist} tag issue.  see if this is better now:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming.2FReplacing_Existing_Packages

-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130828/3b8c3b6f/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the devel mailing list