Should a working fedup in Fedora N's stable repository be a release criterion for N+1?

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 18:33 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> I don't think Fedora is doing its users any favors by declaring F20 to
> be released when upgrading from F19 using 'fedup --source network 20'
> is known to be broken.  The bleeding-edge types can already upgrade to
> the beta.

I'm attempting to imagine Microsoft or Apple telling users to install an
experimental, insufficiently-tested utility to perform a risky operating
system upgrade -- or even a stable, sufficiently-tested utility that is
nonetheless labeled as experimental.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20131217/f8f4729f/attachment.sig>