Should a working fedup in Fedora N's stable repository be a release criterion for N+1?

Andrew Lutomirski luto at mit.edu
Wed Dec 18 20:00:21 UTC 2013


On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Markus Mayer <lotharlutz at gmx.de> wrote:
> On 12/18/2013 08:22 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> OK, so I'll re-ask my original question.  Fedora 20 was released with
>> a broken update path from F19.  Should the release criteria be
>> amended?  This particular issue would have been avoided if F19's fedup
>> were frozen along with F20 and if all of the destined-for-stable
>> versions were tested together as a release criterion.
>>
>> --Andy
>>
>
> I'am definitely in favor of this. A working upgrade is as important as a
> working installation.
>
> A suggest that you create a draft of the release criteria change and fill a
> FESCO ticket.

https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1214

--Andy

>
>
> regards
>     Markus
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct


More information about the devel mailing list