Should a working fedup in Fedora N's stable repository be a release criterion for N+1?

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 19:54 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> Admittedly, the FedUp page says "Be sure to get the latest release,
> this may involve enabling updates-testing (yum
> --enablerepo=updates-testing install fedup in the command line)."
> 
> I think this is silly.  Maybe using the updates-testing version will,
> in general, be more reliable, but I think that the version in stable
> should at least be expected to work.

To be clear: I was agreeing with you. The functional fedup just reached
stable *this morning.*
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20131219/0b884390/attachment-0001.sig>