Proposed F19 Feature: Apache OpenOffice

[Miloslav Trmač]

Andrea, all,
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:31 AM, David Tardon <dtardon at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 11:26:35PM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
>> Once upon a time, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com> said:
>> > My understanding is that /usr/bin/soffice is a symlink in order to
>> > keep backwards maintainability. Personally I say both packages drop it
>> > because star office is soooo 1999. :)
>>
>> There's more than just soffice:
>>
>> $ rpm -ql libreoffice-core | grep bin/ | xargs ls -ld
>> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 362 Dec  6 18:37 /usr/bin/libreoffice
>> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root  32 Dec  6 18:37 /usr/bin/ooffice
>> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root  39 Dec  6 18:37 /usr/bin/ooviewdoc
>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root  11 Jan  9 12:46 /usr/bin/openoffice.org -> libreoffice
>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root  38 Jan  9 12:46 /usr/bin/soffice -> /usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/soffice
>> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 360 Dec  6 18:37 /usr/bin/unopkg
>
> There is also /usr/bin/oowriter, oocalc, ooimpress, oodraw and oobase
> that belong to other libreoffice-* subpackages.

The feature page only discusses the soffice link; what does the
feature propose to do about the other conflicting files in /usr/bin?
   Mirek