ConsoleKit and esound retirement

Michael Scherer misc at zarb.org
Wed Feb 13 22:38:42 UTC 2013


Le mercredi 13 février 2013 à 12:58 -0800, Dan Mashal a écrit :
> 
> On Feb 13, 2013 10:58 AM, "Lennart Poettering" <mzerqung at 0pointer.de>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 13.02.13 02:44, Dan Mashal (dan.mashal at gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> > > Please can we test this on rawhide first if anything? I'm pretty
> sure a lot
> > > of thing are still ck dependant. We are still trying to catch up
> to systemd.
> >
> > So, in contrast to the esound discussion I do not sense too much
> > opposition to me just retiring CK. So I'd probably do that in
> Rawhide
> > next week or so. CK would hence disappear in F19, but would give
> > everybody time until the branch or freeze or so to fix their
> packages...
> >
> > Lennart
> >
> > --
> > Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
> > --
> > devel mailing list
> > devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> 
> Sorry if I sound ignorant but:
> 
> No. I meant fedora 20 rawhide. What is the problem with keeping it? 
> 
> Are we just trying to break something different every time we release
> a new version of Fedora? 
> 
> Regardless, do you know exactly what depends on consolekit and what
> doesn't? Have you gone through every package?

That's a valid concern. While the list of packages requiring consolekit
are quite small ( ie, 3 packages, 1 being a shell script with support to
disable ck ), we cannot really check those using the dbus interface in a
exhaustive way.

However, I have already removed consolekit on my F18 without any notable
issue, so I do not think any breakage would be blocking. We have the
whole F19 cycle to find and detect the few packages needing fix.


-- 
Michael Scherer



More information about the devel mailing list