Ruby 2.0 in F19
vondruch at redhat.com
Wed Jan 2 09:59:46 UTC 2013
Dne 21.12.2012 20:58, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky napsal(a):
> Sigh ... now there are *three* incompatible Ruby syntax / semantics
> "standards" to deal with.
Don't spread FUD please.
> Why don't we just ship 'rvm' or 'rbenv' and force everyone to manage
> their own Ruby environments? ;-)
There used to be RVM in Fedora, but we dropped it, since it cannot be
installed system wide while manage Ruby locally, as discussed here .
Moreover, upstream is not very keen to see RVM packaged, since they
think that '$ \curl -L https://get.rvm.io | bash -s stable --ruby' is
super easy and super intuitive.
More information about the devel