comps' "standard" group spring cleaning?

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:55:21 -0500
Matthew Miller <mattdm at fedoraproject.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 04:46:25PM +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> > >ok, I guess I could try again. Can we remove prelink?
> > >What does it get us these days?
> > Has anything changed about prelink since the last time it was
> > discussed here?
> > "prelink should not mess with running executables":
> > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-July/169819.html ?
> > Or even since "prelink: is it worth it?":
> > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2009-July/034529.html
> 
> Hardware is faster and any benefit less necessary, making it even
> less worth the tradeoffs? I'd like to see some numbers.

Additionally, a number of things in fedora are now being built with PIE
and thus cannot be prelinked. 

(ok, "a number" is probibly an exaggeration, but it's a few at least). 

kevin

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130111/b0180bef/attachment.sig>