Results of a test mass rebuild of rawhide/x86_64 with gcc-4.8.0-0.1.fc19
Dave Jones
davej at redhat.com
Mon Jan 14 16:32:09 UTC 2013
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 09:40:27PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As part of preparations for possible switch of system compiler in F19
> to GCC 4.8.0, we (myself and Marek Polacek) have performed a test mass
> rebuild of rawhide (December 17th package list) using gcc-4.8.0-0.1.fc19
> on x86_64, and for those packages that failed also rebuilt the same
> package with gcc-4.7.2-9.fc19 to quickly remove from the list packages
> that fail for non-gcc related reasons.
>
> 11687 packages built fine, 933 packages failed to build with
> both gcc-4.8.0-0.1.f19.x86_64.rpm and gcc-4.7.2-9.fc19.x86_64.rpm
> (ignored for this analysis, unlikely to be gcc 4.8 related).
>
> The remaining packages, that failed to build with 4.8.0-0.1
> and succeeded with 4.7.2-9 are listed below. 67 of these look
> like issues on the package side, 22 gcc bugs that were supposedly
> fixed by now upstream and thus should be ok in 4.8.0-0.3 when
> it is built next week and 3 are not yet fixed gcc issues.
I'm pleasantly surprised that the kernel isn't in the failure list.
No issues at all ? Or was it skipped for some reason ?
Dave
More information about the devel
mailing list