Fwd: [Libjpeg-turbo-users] jpeg-9, API/ABI compatibility, and the future role of this project

[Michael Stahl]

On 16/01/13 16:55, Adam Tkac wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 01:02:57PM +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
>> On 15/01/13 20:04, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:

>>> I hope other distributions don't use that release.
>>
>> FWIW i'm afraid i've had to build jpeg8 from source already to get a
>> certain binary [1] built on Ubuntu to run on Fedora 17...
>>
>> [1] actually a git repo full of binaries:
>>     https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Bibisect
> 
> I read the link and it seems libjpeg62 is sufficient (i.e. jpeg6 ABI) for bibisect. So
> you should not need jpeg8 ABI.

read more carefully then: the git repo contains binaries built against
different Ubuntu baseline versions, the older of which have jpeg6 and
the newer jpeg8.