installer final touches matters
Kevin Fenzi
kevin at scrye.com
Tue Jan 22 15:59:09 UTC 2013
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:17:48 +0100
Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler at chello.at> wrote:
> John Reiser wrote:
> > I await documentation of claims that anaconda RAM requirements
> > have been "skyrocketing" over the last several releases.
>
> The officially documented RAM requirements are, at least:
> RHL 9: http://www.gurulabs.com/downloads/RELEASE-NOTES-RHL9.html
> | Memory:
> | - Minimum for text-mode: 64MB
> | - Minimum for graphical: 128MB
> | - Recommended for graphical: 192MB
> F17:
> http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/17/html/Release_Notes/sect-
> Release_Notes-Welcome_to_Fedora_17.html#sect-Release_Notes-Hardware_Overview
> | Minimum RAM for text-mode: 768 MiB | Minimum RAM for graphical: 768
> MiB | Recommended RAM for graphical: 1152 MiB
> A 12-fold increase since the inception of Fedora.
>
> (For F18, the memory requirements are entirely undocumented in the
> release notes.)
I have this strange sense of deja-vu. Like we have had this exact same
thread/conversation before.
Why yes, yes we have:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-November/173800.html
Can you please stop the argument by repetition ?
It's getting very very old.
kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130122/07593981/attachment.sig>
More information about the devel
mailing list