Proposed F19 Feature: Fedora Upgrade - using yum

"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" johannbg at gmail.com
Fri Jan 25 20:42:02 UTC 2013


On 01/25/2013 08:32 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 20:17 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>> On 01/25/2013 07:39 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> 2013/1/23 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg at gmail.com>:
>>>> On 01/23/2013 10:55 PM, drago01 wrote:
>>>>> Supporting "none" is not an option.
>>>> Really suddenly not an option.
>>>>
>>>> We did that for a long time why is that suddenly not an option so please
>>>> enlighten me why that's not an option.
>>>>
>>>> Users are better of keeping /home on a separated partition and re-use it
>>>> with an fresh install then those poor attempts to "support" upgrades one way
>>>> or another which at this point in time we cant do since the bits for that
>>>> aren't properly aligned to make that happen...
>>> ? 8-)
>>>
>>> I really can't imagine it.
>>>
>>> I use Fedora as a server system for my daily developer work. I use
>>> many services with different configurations. Actually updating it with
>>> preupgrade/fedup is sometimes hard. Reinstalling whole system after
>>> each release will be super painful.
>>>
>> ?
>>
>> Keep your server configuration in git and keep the relevant data on
>> separated partition then reinstall and checkout the config(s)
> Why should I do all this when I can simply apt-get upgrade^W^Wyum
> upgrade ?

You do whatever floats your boat I prefer doing fresh installs and keep 
relevant data on their own partitions and configuration files in git you 
prefer to do it via yum or fedupgrade.

JBG


More information about the devel mailing list