More unhelpful update descriptions

[drago01]

On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Dan Mashal <dan.mashal at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Pierre-Yves Luyten <py at luyten.fr> wrote:
>> Not sure if it makes any sense but maybe could we have something like
>> "freeze tag changes until desc is better".
>>
>> I propose this because testers will not _really_ want to -1 karma, and
>> as a maintainer it might be a bit hard, but with a good reminder like
>> "not pushed to stable until desc is better" I would have made less
>> mistakes
>>
>> yes not being reminded is not an excuse and such proposal would not save
>> time, still I believe it could help more than hurt
>
>
> There is already a perfect example of this.
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-11846/selinux-policy-3.12.1-57.fc19

This is also a perfect example of useless "does not fix bug x" karma.
If it is not *worse* then the previous package there is no reason to
give it negative karma.