More unhelpful update descriptions

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 09:32 +0200, drago01 wrote:
> This is also a perfect example of useless "does not fix bug x" karma.
> If it is not *worse* then the previous package there is no reason to
> give it negative karma.
Yes, that is a problem too. Particularly so with selinux updates.

But getting back to the current concern, the "here is where" update has
now made it to 3 karma and is going to go out to thousands of users.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130703/62eba734/attachment.sig>