More unhelpful update descriptions

[Reindl Harald]

Am 03.07.2013 19:54, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
> On Wed, 03 Jul 2013 19:38:00 +0200
> Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:
>> a new upstream-release does not implicitly close any bug
>>
>> on the other hand it makes hardly sense to hold back a update
>> not fixing all bugreports - this all makes no sense for me
> 
> I think there's a misunderstanding here. 
> 
> Bodhi doesn't do anything at all with bugs that are not attached to an
> update. How could it?
> 
> The bugs that are attached to an update are supposed to be fixed by
> that update. If they are not, you should -1 karma the update and if
> possible note in the bug that it's not fixed and help provide any info
> to the maintainer in bug. 
> 
> If the update has some bugs attached, but doesn't fix a bug that is NOT
> attached, you should NOT -1 karma for that bug not being fixed. It's
> not expected that it would be. You could note in that bug that the
> update doesn't fix it, but the maintainer probibly knows that or they
> would have also attached that bug to the update. 
> 
> Bodhi will (by default, but override able) close any bugs attached to
> an update when the update goes stable. If you find such a closed but
> that was not really fixed, reopen it or note to the maintainer in the
> bug and they can do so. 
> 
> Is that more clear?

this makes much more sense
thanks!

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 263 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130703/a51bb6ff/attachment-0001.sig>