F20 System Wide Change: ARM as primary Architecture

Peter Robinson pbrobinson at gmail.com
Tue Jul 9 17:33:53 UTC 2013


On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Kyle McMartin <kyle at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 01:00:27PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> >> = Proposed System Wide Change: ARM as primary Architecture =
>> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ARM_as_Primary
>> >
>> > How many F19 packages currently fail to build (or are excluded but
>> > shouldn't be) on ARM?  How do we stand against the other items of
>> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Secondary_Architecture_Promotion_Requirements
>> > ?
>>
>> I'm particularly curious about the developer resources and release
>> criteria items.  The proposal calls out one kernel maintainer, which
>> is great, but doesn't expand on how many others are doing ARM work.
>> Is the ARM team on the hook to go through all of the existing QA
>> criteria on ARM platforms and do they have enough resources to do
>> this?
>>
>
> I wouldn't limit the things I'm willing to fix to the kernel. I'll
> happily look into all ARM FTBFS.

There's a number of people working on this but ultimately like all
problems we can handle as much as possible but we also need assistance
by the package maintainers themselves.

Peter


More information about the devel mailing list