F20 System Wide Change: ARM as primary Architecture

[Adam Williamson]

On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 18:01 -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
> On 07/10/2013 05:34 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 09:46 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >> On Tue, 9 Jul 2013 22:36:39 +0100
> >> Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Till Maas <opensource at till.name>
> >>> wrote:
> >>
> >> ...snip...
> >>
> >>>> test instances for maintainers as described here:
> >>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Machine_Resources_For_Package_Maintainers
> >>>
> >>> I've never seen the above before.
> >>>
> >>> There's instances available to QA
> >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/qa-machines
> >>
> >> I was working on adding 2 more SOC's for packagers earlier this week. 
> >>
> >> I wanted to see how much call there was for these... should I try and
> >> make them accessable by all packagers? Or just have a group and
> >> interested people could be added to that group?
> > 
> > They're probably useful for update testing, but I don't think they're
> > much use for release validation, since that generally equates to testing
> > deployment, which you can't really do from an ssh session.
> > 
> 
> FWIW I'll be proposing (likely tomorrow) an F20 feature/change for ARM virt on
> x86, which will track the missing libvirt/virt-manager/etc bits needed to run
> Fedora ARM in a VM on x86 using standard tools. Hopefully that helps here.

It most DEFINITELY would, assuming it will perform at least acceptably
(not askin' for miracles, but YKWIM). Thanks muchly.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net