F20 System Wide Change: ARM as primary Architecture
Brendan Conoboy
blc at redhat.com
Thu Jul 11 18:39:08 UTC 2013
On 07/11/2013 11:22 AM, Peter Jones wrote:
> The point of this isn't just that it was broken, though - the concern
> here is that the test suite said it was not working. What else isn't
> working because nobody has even looked? What's worrisome here is not
> merely that a major security feature wasn't working. While that is
> troubling, the fact of the matter is that people *not* on your team
> thought it wasn't working, and assumed that you knew. The test suite
> is giving failing results. That's not usually an indicator of high
> quality or success.
Yes, this is a serious issue for any architecture. It's more of a
people problem than technical though. We can solve it for gcc on ARM
specifically, but as a general case I don't have an easy answer.
> The worry isn't that there's one thing here or there that doesn't work -
> the worry is that there are relatively major Fedora features that we've
> advertised in big letters in the relatively recent past that simply
> don't work because nobody has paid any attention to whether or not they
> work.
Hmm.
--
Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / blc at redhat.com
More information about the devel
mailing list