F20 System Wide Change: No Default Syslog

[Billy Crook]

On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 1:28 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg at gmail.com
> wrote:

> On 07/19/2013 06:12 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>
>> Progress does not that frequently depend on removing older
>> functionality.  Specifically in this case, removing rsyslog does not
>> make journal in any way better.
>>
>>
>>
> Perhaps not that' s a matter of opinion but to we should be able to
> compare it against the discussion and decision that was made when it was
> declared that rsyslog should become our syslogger over for example
> syslog-ng to see if it at least meats those standards.
>

This is *not the same thing*.  In case anyone here is unaware, rsyslog and
syslog-ng are exclusive.  ${Syslog} and systemd are not.


> In anycase the fact cannot be ignored or denied that it is unnecessary to
> ship two sysloggers...


I haven't seen anyone asking to ship two sysloggers.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130719/89469f5f/attachment.html>