Porting some packages from Russian Fedora

[Ankur Sinha]

On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 00:40 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Looking at Koji from Russian Fedora, I noticed some plugins for Gimp 
> missing in the current Fedora repository.
> I am interested to port them which bring some questions, do I keep
> the 
> original changelog and notify ported from Russian Fedoraor
> do I start the new spec with the statement based from Russian Fedora?
> 
> The plugins in question are:
> gimp-dds-plugins
> gimp-wavelet-denoise-plugins
> 
> Ref:
> ----
> http://koji.russianfedora.ru/koji/search?match=glob&type=package&terms=gimp*

I'm more curious why there are packages at a Fedora downstream that
aren't on the main Fedora repositories. Are these non free?

If Russian Fedora is a remix that uses packages that are not in Fedora,
especially non free ones, it should be following the trademark
guidelines, and not use the Fedora logo etc.[1,2].

[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:Secondary_trademark_usage_guidelines?rd=Legal/Secondary_trademark_usage_guidelines
[2]
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:Trademark_guidelines#Secondary_Mark
-- 
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha

Join Fedora! Come talk to us!
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130722/36e663e4/attachment.sig>