RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk)

Matthew Miller mattdm at fedoraproject.org
Mon Jul 22 15:49:11 UTC 2013


On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 05:39:33PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> This proposal doesn't seem to make rings 0 or 1 particularly more
> integrated - just smaller; and it places a higher barrier to entry to
> adding useful functionality to the core.

I didn't intend to say that. 

> Want to add new a JSON library, HTTPS library with OCSP support, DNS
> resolver to the integrated core?  Sorry, 30% of the stacks are on a
> 2-year lifecycle and can't use it now; other 30% have decided to ship
> unmodified upstream code and will not integrate any Fedora
> Core-specific patches.

I definitely didn't intend to say the "sorries" you've put there. In fact,
quite the opposite. How can I make that more clear?

-- 
Matthew Miller  ☁☁☁  Fedora Cloud Architect  ☁☁☁  <mattdm at fedoraproject.org>


More information about the devel mailing list