EPEL (was Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk))

Adam Williamson awilliam at redhat.com
Mon Jul 22 22:24:27 UTC 2013


On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 12:13 -0600, Eric Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:52 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
> <johannbg at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 07/22/2013 04:41 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >> They chose to use a _downstream_ distribution. RHEL *is* Fedora, it's
> >> just a Fedora that's been hardened and held to a certain level of
> >> ABI/API compatibility.
> > Which is my point exactly instead of helping increasing the overall quality
> > of Fedora the infrastructure decide to run to another distribution.
> >
> > RHEL != Fedora
> 
> But it's not an objective of Fedora to have long-term-stable releases
> suitable for running servers!  No one in their right mind runs any
> rapid development distribution (not just Fedora) on critical
> infrastructure.

Is _that_ why the nice men in white coats keep showing up and taking me
away to the bouncy bouncy room?!
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net



More information about the devel mailing list