RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk)

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 19:08:36 +0000
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 07/23/2013 07:08 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 18:56:08 +0000
> > "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 07/23/2013 06:55 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >>> We have a increasing number of Fedora instances in places where it
> >>> makes sense. We don't exclusively use Fedora everywhere because it
> >>> doesn't make sense for a number of things.
> >> Hosting/running what exactly?
> > I'm not fully sure how to parse this... are you asking what things
> > we are running on Fedora instances? Or what things we are running in
> > general?
> 
> The opposite all the instances or rather all the services that are
> not running on an Fedora, the ones that dont make sense running on
> fedora for number of things from your perspective.

I already listed out the main reasons in the other post I made that you
didn't read: 

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/186406.html

(where I said it wasn't just the release cycle, and you replied saying
it was highlighting about how it was the release cycle). 

Anyhow, I think this will be my last post here... 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130723/46dd2546/attachment.sig>