F20 System Wide Change: No Default Sendmail

Kevin Fenzi kevin at scrye.com
Wed Jul 24 22:12:03 UTC 2013


On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 15:10:05 -0700
Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 11:14 -0500, Billy Crook wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Frank Ch. Eigler <fche at redhat.com>
> > wrote:
> > > It's tempting to carry this argument too far.  We can be first
> > > with good new ideas; first with experimental stuff; first with
> > > additions. We need not be first with bad ideas (and discussions
> > > here are a way of figuring out good from bad, let's not beg the
> > > question).  We also need not be first when it comes to
> > > subtraction of functionality.
> > 
> > This is exactly, what I'm saying.  Please contribute your vote at
> > the meeting.
> 
> You seem to be operating under a misconception. FESCo members vote.
> No-one else does.

To clarify a bit: FESCo members vote, and you vote for FESCo
members. ;) 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130724/945ce10c/attachment.sig>


More information about the devel mailing list