RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk)

[Adam Williamson]

On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 16:22 -0600, Eric Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 16:04 -0600, Eric Smith wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:
> >> > if that would be the case i would not run Apache 2.4, and Zend Opcache
> >> > in production on Fdora 17
> >>
> >> I wouldn't run *anything* in production on Fedora 17. That's what the
> >> downstream "enterprise" distributions are for.
> >
> > We've been through this rodeo a few days ago. There's a solid body of
> > opinion that your statement is going too far. Many of us run
> > 'production' systems of various types on Fedora. (All of
> > happyassassin.net runs on Fedora, FWIW).
> 
> And what are you going to do for security updates on Fedora 17?  Live
> without?  Backport and rebuild everything yourself?

I updated my server VMs from F17 to F19 on Saturday. Took about two
hours to complete all the upgrades and fix the few buglets that showed
up.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net