RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk)

[Subhendu Ghosh]

On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net>wrote:

> >
> > In the OS/App differentiation, you are expecting each is coming from a
> different source.
> > Apps are either boxed, or coming from a project.
> > The app provider should fix their version of libxml, and the OS provider
> should fix their version of libxml
>
> which is the definition of "fundamentally flawed"
> period




Lets disagree here. I don't believe it is fundamentally flawed.

It seems you are expecting every software developer in the world to accept
the versions that a Fedora packager has selected for a release without
regards to functionality or changes being exposed. No wonder it it becomes
impossible to run any app "on " Fedora for any length of time.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130728/733275f4/attachment-0001.html>