Obsoleting ConsoleKit once and for all

Kevin Fenzi kevin at scrye.com
Wed Jul 31 19:00:52 UTC 2013


On Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:28:55 +0200
Christoph Wickert <christoph.wickert at gmail.com> wrote:

> Am Montag, den 29.07.2013, 16:37 +0200 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> > On Sun, 28.07.13 13:24, Christoph Wickert
> > (christoph.wickert at gmail.com) wrote:
> > 
> > > and by pcmamfm and thunar for
> > > handling permissions of removable devices.
> > 
> > I don't know what "pcmamfm" and "thunar" are, but why would they use
> > ConsoleKit for that? Can you elaborate?
> 
> thunar and pcmanfm are file managers and require ConsoleKit for
> handling removable storage.

I'm traveling right now so don't have time to look, but are you sure
this is still the case for Thunar? I see no deps, no ck-* functions, and
everything seems to work fine here with no ConsoleKit installed. 

I'll try and investigate more in the next few days when I am back home. 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130731/9d4c35a3/attachment.sig>


More information about the devel mailing list