Fixing proxy support in Fedora (was Re: Orphaning few packages)

[David Woodhouse]

On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 20:41 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Well, perhaps we should make libproxy *query* pacrunner, but not use
> pacrunner's libproxy replacement. That's "just another information
> source" for libproxy, but the patch has been languishing for years
> without being applied.
> http://code.google.com/p/libproxy/issues/detail?id=152

I think that's probably the way forward for now. I've updated the bug
above with a new patch, tested in the F19 libproxy package. I've also
dropped the libproxy-replacement part of the pacrunner package that I've
submitted at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=971888

If someone could review that package, I'd be most grateful. I've
actually passed it through fedora-review and posted the results myself,
but of course I'm not allowed to tick the box for my own package :)

-- 
dwmw2
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5745 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130607/9a3c2c4f/attachment.bin>