Bad file access on the rise
Steve Grubb
sgrubb at redhat.com
Sat Jun 8 14:10:14 UTC 2013
On Saturday, June 08, 2013 09:57:03 AM Doug Ledford wrote:
> Bad test. The first run took the hit for getting the file info into
> page cache, after that, everything was run from cache and you got the
> second result above and the results below. You have to make sure that
> from run to run the cache state of the file in question is identical.
Try it yourself. :-) I know what you are saying and run the test probably 8
times before posting results. I also have the audit rule loaded...so removing
it:
[sgrubb at x2 noatime]$ time ./test noatime
real 0m0.031s
user 0m0.006s
sys 0m0.024s
[sgrubb at x2 noatime]$ time ./test noatime
real 0m0.033s
user 0m0.002s
sys 0m0.032s
[sgrubb at x2 noatime]$ time ./test noatime
real 0m0.036s
user 0m0.002s
sys 0m0.031s
[sgrubb at x2 noatime]$ time ./test atime
real 0m0.023s
user 0m0.001s
sys 0m0.021s
[sgrubb at x2 noatime]$ time ./test atime
real 0m0.022s
user 0m0.003s
sys 0m0.019s
[sgrubb at x2 noatime]$ time ./test atime
real 0m0.023s
user 0m0.002s
sys 0m0.019s
Without the audit rules, it is faster. But again opening with noatime
attempted is measurably slower.
-Steve
More information about the devel
mailing list