/usr/lib64/udev/rules.d/ actually processed?

Reindl Harald h.reindl at thelounge.net
Mon Jun 24 19:11:28 UTC 2013

Am 24.06.2013 20:57, schrieb Bill Nottingham:
> Florian Weimer (fweimer at redhat.com) said: 
>> Does udev/systemd actually process files in rhis directory?  I found
>> a couple of files in that directory, from the isdn4k-utils package
>> and from libwacom-0.6.1-1.fc17.x86_64.  The lib64 directory isn't
>> mentioned in udev(7), and I can't find it in the
>> /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-udevd binary.
> No

what means "No" in this context?

[] /usr/lib64/udev/rules.d/ is ignored because "lib64" is wrong
[] /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/ is also ignored
[] /etc/udev/rules.d/ which is used like below will also not work in F18+

however, only "No" is not a very good response

[root at proxy:~]$ cat /etc/udev/rules.d/50-ats.rules
# /etc/udev/rules.d/50-ats.rules
# Apache Traffic Server owns disk for RAW access
KERNEL=="sdc", OWNER="ats"

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 263 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130624/8d71b5db/attachment.sig>

More information about the devel mailing list