Django-1.5 build

Matthias Runge mrunge at matthias-runge.de
Fri Mar 1 07:41:41 UTC 2013


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02/28/2013 05:46 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> That seems to be a good proposal for me. Review request is 
>> here[1], based on the current python-django package. Shouldn't
>> be an issue. For EPEL, we have the Django14 package. This
>> shouldn't change there, but we can think about introducing
>> provides: python-django14 there.
> 
> 
> I'm unclear (based on this and your other reply to the list which
> came in about ten minutes later). Are you agreed that we should
> drop the 'python-django' package and go to versioned ones
> exclusively, or are you proposing that we would eventually turn
> python-django15 into python-django (e.g. when python-django16
> arrives).

Actually, I was proposing to have python-django as package to include
every version number, and to introduce a package
python-django%{version-1} package when a new %{version} comes out.

Now, I'm more attracted to rename the python-django package (yeay,
another Django-rename) to python-django14 and to submit a new package
python-django15 for review. When 1.6 comes out, python-django14 will
get deprecated and python-django16 will be submitted for review.
But still, currently, we're carrying provides like this:
Provides:       django = %{version}-%{release}
Provides:       Django = %{version}-%{release}
and also provide python-django. The question remains, what to do here,
ie. which package should carry those provides. (probably the then
renamed python-django14 package, to make sure, not to break anything.


> That's an interesting question... perhaps we should have both 
> sub-packages install into %{_libexec} and use the alternatives
> system to decide which one gets /usr/bin/django-admin. That's
> probably a good question for packaging at lists.fedoraproject.org
> 
Will do so.
- -- 
Matthias Runge <mrunge at matthias-runge.de>
               <mrunge at fedoraproject.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRMFu1AAoJEOnz8qQwcaIWUGMIAI5gMvDMb2iwcaLWxwZZsRTN
aVedreypqeUOQzxfqhLkTf6Th6UzYhmZiVAeDE/iZmkZ43ktwemPJwMKBoxvnQEJ
oPuM5ieCi5bT/5EIcV9bnHalqINMTexNpTYqezhM+cseIRd2R2wWFAyWdXfzNQTL
MFDMAdKvSBXmIT+1gQfS3y8nuOnK4IgktlDaWgZJ3Jr5QIctm5riuLJ5HsWHB7/t
Qs0AcXGgI1HfxH+677CZfh0bi4MiLayW/y0Ze+vRxsKLMI4Gz/ZKaes10wF4tYlw
HXd6roWW2kh+LLODwxTdSKogUi6/20eoz7e+Cm3JfDp5COjUtQvEbozVWgtUjPA=
=ZGOC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the devel mailing list